Barelds, D. P. H., & Barelds-Dijkstra, P. (2007). Links one of lover identity feature resemblance, matchmaking start, matchmaking quality, and love. [ Website links ]
Baxter, L. An excellent., & West, L. (2003). Pair thinking of their parallels and you will distinctions: A good dialectical position. Journal from Individual and you may Social Relationship, 20, 491-514. [ Links ]
Berscheid, Elizabeth. (1985)patibility, interdependence, and you can emotion. For the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict matchmaking (pp. 143-161). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, E., Dion, K., Walster, Elizabeth., & Walster, Grams. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and you may relationship selection: An examination of your own matching hypothesis. Diary away from Fresh Public Therapy, eight, 173-189. [ Website links ]
Record of Public and personal Matchmaking, 24, 479-496
Berscheid, Age., & Regan, P. (2005). New psychology from social relationship. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education (Prentice Hall). [ Links ]
Berger, C. Roentgen. (1975). Activity show and you may attributional communication given that determinants of social destination. Message Monographs, forty, 280-286. [ Backlinks ]
Berscheid, Age., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Destination and you can personal matchmaking. Inside the D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), This new manual off societal mindset (Vol. 2, fourth ed. Pp. 193-281). Nyc: McGraw-Hill. [ Backlinks ]
Buckwalter, J. G., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, G. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2004, Get eleven). U.S. Patent six,735,568. Washington, DC. [ Website links ]
Buckwalter, J. Grams., Carter, S. R., Forgatch, Grams. T. Parsons, T. D., & Warren, N. C. (2008, Late. 18). U.S. Patent seven,454,357B2. Washington, DC. [ Links ]
Buss, D. Meters. (1984). Marital variety to have identity dispositions: Evaluation having three other analysis supply. Behavior Family genes, 14, 111-123. [ Website links ]
Byrne, D., & Rhamey, Roentgen. (1965). Magnitude regarding positive and negative reinforcements since the a good determinant regarding destination. Record of Identification and you can Societal Mindset, 2, 884-889. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S. R. (2005, Feb.), For modern-time Cupids, data replaces matchmaking: Mental science is about the new profitable matches made on eHarmony. Relationship getting Mental Technology Observer, 18. Installed off [ Links ]
Carter, S. R., & Buckwalter, J. G. (2009). Increasing mate choice over the internet: An assessment out-of dating quality between marriage ceremonies due to an online dating system and marriages due to unfettered possibilities. Interpersona: An international Journal into Individual Relationships, step three, 105-125. [ Backlinks ]
Carter, S., & Snow, C. (2004, May). Permitting single men and women get into top marriages playing with predictive types of marital achievement. Report displayed in the 16th Annual Conference of your own American Mental Community. [ Hyperlinks ]
Strategy and program getting determining people who are attending keeps a successful relationship
C). How does personality amount during the ination from characteristic anxiety, negativity, and you will marital pleasure. Log off Character and Personal Mindset, 78, 326-336. [ Backlinks ]
Clark, M. S. (1985). Ramifications out of relationship method of having skills being compatible. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible relationships (pp. 119-140). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Coombs, R g?? till den h?¤r webbplatsen. H., & Kenkel, W. F. (1966). Sex variations in relationship aspiration and you may satisfaction that have pc-developed couples. Log out of ily, 28, 62-66. [ Website links ]
Cooper, An effective., & Sportolari, L. (1997). Relationship on the net: Wisdom on line interest. Record regarding Sex Education and Cures, twenty two, 7-14. [ Hyperlinks ]
Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2008). Create anybody understand what needed: An identical or complementary partner? Evolutionary Mindset, six, 595-602. [ Website links ]
Feingold, A good. (1988). Coordinating to have appeal in the close people and you can same-sex family members: A meta-investigation and you can theoretic criticism. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 226-235. [ Backlinks ]
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Off popular with terrible: Disenchantment which have a romantic mate. Sociological Point of views, forty two, 263-280. [ Backlinks ]